Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81780 (KAR)

GOVINDA REDDY v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

MSA/190/2024 · 2025-11-26

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48977 MSA No. 190 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 190 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: GOVINDA REDDY S/O HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT KODIHALLI TALAK HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. JAGAN MOHAN M.T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CHITRADURGA - 577 501 2. NAGARAJ S/O HANUMAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT KODIHALLI TALAK HOBLI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522 …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22/10/2009 IN M.A. NO.33/2008 PASSED BY THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT CHITRADURGA BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL WITH COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48977 MSA No. 190 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation. 2. Order sheet dated 19.11.2025 reads as under: " Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time. The appeal is listed for compliance of office objections for fifth time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. Learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to comply with all the office objections before next date of hearing. A week's time is granted to comply with the same. List finally as a last chance, on 26.11.2025." 3. The matter is listed for sixth time for compliance of office objections. Still, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14