BIDHAN RAO ALIAS VIDHAN RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./1204/2025 · 2025-06-13
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8178 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8178 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15453 Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P No.1204 of 2025
Bidhan Rao @ Vidhan Ray, aged about 31 years, son of Tarni Ray @ Tarni Rao, resident of Udhwa, P.O. Udhwa, P.S.-Radhanagar, District- Sahibganj. … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… Opposite Party
Coram:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Petitioner : Md. Asadul Haque, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
Order No.02/Dated- 13.06.2025
1. Heard, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. Instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been preferred for modification of order dated 18.07.2023 passed by this Court in A.B.A. No. 5383 of 2023 arising out of Radhanagar P.S. Case No. 15/2023 for extending further four week’s time to surrender before the trial court.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that before passing of the order dated 18.07.2023, the petitioner had gone to Banglore to earn his livelihood as he is the only sole bread earner of his family and he had been working there, but due to miscommunication, the petitioner could not be communicated regard passing of the order daed 18.07.2023. Hence, he could not surrendered before the learned trial court within stipulated period of time.
4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for State has opposed the prayer for modification of the order dated 18.07.2023 passed by this Court in A.B.A. No. 5383 of 2023.
2025:JHHC:15453 Page | 2
5. Considering the earlier order passed on 18.07.2023 for surrendering before the learned trial court within two weeks’ from the date of passing of the order and the present petition was filed on 05.03.2025 with simple ground taken by the petitioner is that he was in Banglore in connection with earning livelihood. Considering the grant of anticipatory bail, the reason assigned does not appears to be genuine and convincing. Hence, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-