IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMP(M) No. 295 of 2024. Decided on : 23 rd May, 2025. Vishal Bhukta ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram:The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G. for the respondents-State. Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). CMP(M) No. 295 of 2024. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the review petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Review Petition No……..of 2025. 3. Be registered. 4. The only ground for seeking review of judgment dated 28.08.2023 passed by this Court in CWPOA No. 2761 of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2020 along with CWPOA No. 2669 of 2020 is that the petitioner had prayed for consequential benefits from the date when he was wrongly denied appointment. 5. In my considered view, this cannot be a ground for review as the relief claimed but not granted amounts to denial of the claim. Review petition is accordingly dismissed. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 23rd May, 2025. (jai) …2…