HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 10948 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA has placed the instructions before the Court today, which are kept on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. The writ petition has been filed with prayer to quash the order dated 17.02.2021 passed by District Basic Education Officer and to direct the respondent no.2 to pay entire promotional pay scale and other consequential benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. 15.01.2010 along with 18% interest. 4. On 04.08.2025, the following order was passed:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The writ petition has been filed with prayer to quash the order dated 17.02.2021 passed by District Basic Education Officer and to direct the respondent no.2 to pay entire promotional pay scale and other consequential benefits to the petitioner w.e.f. 15.01.2010 along with 18% interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the directions of this Court in the earlier writ petitions, Committee was to be constituted under Rule 16 of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1984, however, the impugned order has been passed without constituting the Committee. No purpose will be solved to remit the matter again as twice the contempt petition has already been filed granting opportunity to the respondents to comply with the earlier order. Thus, keeping the matter pending, the respondent no.2 is granted opportunity to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushpendra Kumar, Ramdhan, Shiv Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh Bhoj Raj Singh .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) constitute the Committee under Rule 16 of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1984, as directed by this Court in Writ A No.56247 of 2014 (Bhojraj Singh vs. State of UP and Another), within a period of four weeks from today, and pass appropriate order accordingly. Put up as fresh on 08.09.2025." 5. On the basis of instructions, Mr. Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA, submits that in compliance of the aforesaid order, respondent no.2 has constituted a Committee under Rule 16 of U.P. Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1984 and has passed the order dated 06.09.2025, accordingly, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. 6. In view of the above, no interference is called for. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. 7. However, the petition is at liberty to challenge the order dated 06.09.2025 passed by respondent no.2, District Basic Education Officer, Aligarh. September 15, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 10948 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad