[131] Nitya Nand Rajinder Si Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] to order dat IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIGAR CR-4313- Date of De Nand versus der Singh Dhillon and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Advocate Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) By way of instant revision pet der dated 13.10.2021, which reads as u “PW1 Nitya Nand again no examination. No other plain Perusal of the record revera have already been granted t cross examination of PWl remaining plaintiff’s evidence. PW1 shall not be read into plaintiff’s evidence stands clo adjourned to 22.11.2021 for de OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH -2022 of Decision : 27.01.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN ocate with on petition, challenge has been raised ds as under:- n not present today for his cross laintiffs evidence is present today. verals that sufficient opportunities ed to the plaintiff for concluding Wl Nitya Nanda as well as for ence. Accordingly, the testimony of into evidence and the remaining closed by order. The case stands or defence evidence. ” raised ross day. ities ing for y of ing nds RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.02.04 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4313- [2] while the C [3] matter has Plaintiff fa opportuniti March, 202 extent owin [4] interest of p technical allowing t evidence. [5] dated 13.10 entire evide will be gran [6] 27.01.2025 ‘R. Sharma' -2022 Counsel for the petitioner sub e the Courts were functioning to a limi Per contra, counsel for resp er has already reached conclusion tiff failed to adduce any evidence d rtunities. However, he is not in a h, 2020 till March 2021 the Courts we t owing to Covid-19. In view of the above, this Co est of parties to the lis that in stead of d approach, the lis is ordered to ing the parties adequate opportun nce. Accordingly, the present revisi 13.10.2021 is set aside. Plaintiff is g e evidence at his own risk and respon granted one opportunity to rebut the Ordered accordingly. .2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable -2- er submits that the order was passed limited extent owing to Covid-19. r respondent No.1 submits that the usion and is at penultimate stage. ence despite availing more than 14 in a position to dispute that from were functioning only to a limited his Court finds that it will be in the ad of dealing the same with the hyper red to be decided on merits after portunity to lead their respective t revision petition is allowed. Order iff is granted one opportunity to lead responsibility. Thereafter, defendant but the same. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No assed at the stage. an 14 from mited in the hyper after ective rder lead dant RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.02.04 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document