SARBJINDER SINGH BHULLAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
CWP/31192/2025 · 2026-07-20
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8176 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8176 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-31192-2025 Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 SARBJINDER SINGH BHULLAR .....Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sammi, Central Government Counsel for respondents no.1 to 4-UOI.
KULDEEP TIWARI,
J.(Oral)
1. Through the instant petition, cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 24.09.2025 (Annexure P-8), whereby the passport authority concerned, has not approved the application for renewal/re-issuance of the passport of the petitioner.
2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 4-UOI, on instructions from the quarter concerned, informs this Court, that the passport has already been re-issued to the petitioner. Therefore, the prayer, as made in the instant petition has been rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the above, no further direction is required to be passed by this Court. Accordingly the instant petition, is closed.
DHARAM VIR 2026.07.21 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-31192-2025 -2-
5. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner, to get the instant petition revived by filing an apt motion, in case his grievance still survives.
6.
Disposed of accordingly.
7. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) July 20, 2026
JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.07.21 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document