Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81750 (PNJ)

TWISHA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/20659/2025 · 2025-08-20

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 122 Twisha State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel submits that both respondent No.4 have since passed away and the family pension on account of death of their father has been released in favour of respondent No.4, being the son and as such P9) for sanction in favour of petitioner as also respondent response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respo decide the legal notice dated Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her free to seek legal redress thereupon 20.08.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20659 Date of decision: Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Sumit Dua, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that both respondent No.4 have since passed away and the family pension on account of death of their father has been released in favour of respondent No.4, being the son and as such, she had submitted a legal notice dated 12.05.2025 (Annexu for sanctioning the family pension on account of their mother in equal shares in favour of petitioner as also respondent No.4, which response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner earned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respo decide the legal notice dated 12.05.2025, within a period of Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 20659-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.08.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that both the parents of petitioner and respondent No.4 have since passed away and the family pension on account of death of their father has been released in favour of respondent No.4, being the bmitted a legal notice dated 12.05.2025 (Annexu the family pension on account of their mother in equal shares No.4, which has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the decide the same in a time bound manner. earned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to , within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and i found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No oner and respondent No.4 have since passed away and the family pension on account of death of their father has been released in favour of respondent No.4, being the bmitted a legal notice dated 12.05.2025 (Annexure the family pension on account of their mother in equal shares has yet not evoked any response. He thus, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the earned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the ndents to months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be ASHOK KUMAR 2025.08.21 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document