1 ( 2025:HHC:15725 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA RSA No. 236 of 2016 Date of Decision: May 23, 2025 Sagli Ram (deceased) through LRs ….Appellants. Versus Vidya Devi and others ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellants: Mr.Bharat Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms.Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr.Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. Respondent No.1 is stated to have expired. Vivek Singh Thakur, J (Oral) Ms.Manjeet Kaur, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3, submits that as per instructions available with her, respondent No.1 has expired. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that on contacting the appellants telephonically, they, through Whatsapp message, have communicated that they want to close the case because person who filed the case has died and person whose case it is, has also died. He has also placed on record screenshot of the message received on Whatsapp. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:15725 ) 3. In view of above, as prayed, appeal is dismissed as not pressed as well as for want of prosecution. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. May 1, 2025 (Purohit)