W.P.No.37235 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.10.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.37235 of 2025 Dinakar, S/o.Chandrasekar, No.92, MGR Street, Thandai Periyar Nagar, Korattur, Chennai-600 080 Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-600 003 2.The Regional Deputy Commissioner (Central) Greater Chennai Corporation, No.36-B, 2nd Cross Street, Chennai-600 030 3.The Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536, Chennai Thiruvallur High Way Road, Opp. Dunlop Company Ambattur, Chennai-600 053 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.37235 of 2025 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Unit 19 Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536,Chennai Thiruvallur Highway Road, Opp. Dunlop Company, Ambattur, Chennai-600 053 5.The Assistant Engineer, Division 084 Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536, Chennai Thiruvallur Highway Road, Opp. Dunlop Company, Ambattur Chennai-600 053 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing 2nd respondent to consider and thereby disposing petitioner Appeal Representations dated on 17.7.2025 under section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Yuvaraj For Respondents: Mr.A.Arun Babu Standing Counsel ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The prayer for issuance of direction for expeditious disposal ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.37235 of 2025 of the revision petition filed under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 [the Act] is misconceived, because the remedy under Section 80-A of the Act lies before the appropriate authority as mentioned in Section 80-A itself, whereas, the petitioner has filed such proceedings before the Corporation authorities, which is per se not maintainable. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Section 80-A of the Act against lock and seal notice. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 08.10.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.37235 of 2025 To: 1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-600 003 2.The Regional Deputy Commissioner (Central) Greater Chennai Corporation, No.36-B, 2nd Cross Street, Chennai-600 030 3.The Executive Engineer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536, Chennai Thiruvallur High Way Road, Opp. Dunlop Company Ambattur, Chennai-600 053 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Unit 19 Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536,Chennai Thiruvallur Highway Road, Opp. Dunlop Company, Ambattur, Chennai-600 053 5.The Assistant Engineer, Division 084 Greater Chennai Corporation Zone VII, No.536, Chennai Thiruvallur Highway Road, Opp. Dunlop Company, Ambattur Chennai-600 053 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.37235 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No.37235 of 2025 08.10.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis