- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35080-DB WP No. 14496 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 14496 OF 2022 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI DADAPEER H AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O HAYATH SAB R/OF ADIRALU AT HULITHOTI HOBLI HIRIYUR TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577558. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S RAJESH, ADV.) AND: 1. KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONS UDYOGA SOUDHA PARK HOUSE BANGLAORE-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXERCISE 2ND FLOOR, TTMC COMPLEX K H ROAD, SHANTHINGAR BANGALORE-560027. 3. MEMBER SECRETARY AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXERCISE KALBURGI DISTRICT KALBURGI- 585101. Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35080-DB WP No. 14496 of 2022 4. MD. MOSIN KHAN PATHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS S/O ABIBKHAN HUSMANIA COLONY AFZALPURA-585361 KALBURGI DISTRICT-585101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAKASH K. M., ADV. FOR R1 SRI V SHIVAREDDY, AGA FOR R2 & R3 SRI S THYAGARAJA, ADV. FOR R4) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2022 PASSED BY THE KSAT AT BANGALORE IN APPLICATION NO.5687/2019 AT ANNEXURE-C AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE APPLICATION NO- 5687/2019 FIELD BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT BEFORE THE KSAT AT BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo dated 08.09.2025, which reads as follows: “The petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition the Respondent No.1 has published the revised selection list and in the said list the respondent No.4 has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35080-DB WP No. 14496 of 2022 been selected as excise guard and further petitioner service has been continued the respondent No.2 department. That under these circumstances this writ petition filed by the petitioner does not survive for consideration, accordingly dismissed the petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25