W.P.No.1273 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.1273 of 2025 Deivanayaki … Petitioner vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, T-14, Mangadu Police Station, Mangadu, Chennai. 3.Murugammal 4.Indhra 5.Rajan 6.Ladchavathi 7.Tamilselvan 8.Pannerselvam … Respondents 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1273 of 2025 PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection to the petitioner’s life, liberty and property bearing Plot No. 8 measuring an extent of 1800 sq.ft. Comprised in Survey No. 205/1C situated at Kozhumanivakkam Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Mangadu, Kancheepuram District from the illegal and unlawful acts of the respondents 3 to 8 and their henchmen. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vijayaragavan For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed for a direction, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner’s life, liberty and property bearing Plot No. 8 measuring an extent of 1800 sq.ft. Comprised in Survey No. 205/1C situated at Kozhumanivakkam Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Mangadu, Kancheepuram District from the illegal and unlawful acts of the respondents 3 to 8 and their henchmen. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1273 of 2025 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. It is seen from the records that there is dispute between the petitioner and respondents 3 to 8 herein in respect of the subject property. In fact, the respondents 3 to 8 already filed a suit in O.S.No.279 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sriperumpudur, as against the petitioner for declaration and injunction. However, the said suit was dismissed for default. So far, they did not take any steps to restore the same. Even then, they are disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the 2nd respondent and the same was closed as the petitioner did not appear for the enquiry. That apart, the petitioner is aged about 80 years. 4. In view of the above, the 2nd respondent is directed to conduct fresh investigation on the complaints submitted by the petitioner, dated 14.11.2024 and 14.03.2025, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and respondents 3 to 8 herein and pass orders to provide adequate police protection in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1273 of 2025 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of. No costs. 13.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No dm 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1273 of 2025 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissioner of Police, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Law and Order, T-14, Mangadu Police Station, Mangadu, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.1273 of 2025 G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN , J. dm W.P.(Crl).No.1273 of 2025 13.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis