- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31844 WP No. 23705 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23705 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT VEENA V W/O HARISH C, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/A NO.46, 7TH MAIN ROAD, 9TH CROSS, J C NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU 560 086. 2. SMT. SHOBHA V, W/O SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A NO.10, CHOWDESHWARI NAGAR, 3RD MAIN, 15TH CROSS, LAGGERI, BENGALURU 560 058. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDHINDRA B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31844 WP No. 23705 of 2025 MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 3. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KP WEST, BENGALURU 560 020. 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, K P WEST BENGALURU - 560020 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO EFFECT KHATA BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.06.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXRUE-F EXPEDITIOUSLY AND TILL THEN NOT TO PRECIPITATE ANY ACTION IN RESPECT OF THE PETITION LAND SY. NO. 37/1 MEASURING 1 ACRE 13 GUNTAS OF THIRUMENAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 and 2. Notice to respondents No.3 and 4 is not necessary for the following reasons: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31844 WP No. 23705 of 2025 2. The petitioners are seeking mutation entry of their names in the RTC after the lands have been acquired for the benefit of the Bangalore Development Authority. Although, it is the claim of the petitioners that their mother Smt. Govindamma had a share in the property and after her demise the share of the mother has now devolved on the petitioners, nevertheless when it is an admitted fact that the lands have been acquired for the benefit of the Bangalore Development Authority, at this juncture question of changing the mutation entries in the revenue records will not arise. If the petitioners are entitled for a share in the property and consequently a part of the compensation, they are required to file an application for apportionment of the award that has been passed in favour of the kathedar. 3. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31844 WP No. 23705 of 2025 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file his memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL