Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81710 (ALL)

ANSHU PANDEY @ VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/6758/2025 · 2025-09-08

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6758 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned AGA for the State and perused the materials on record. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been preferred against the impugned order dated 08.07.2025 passed in Session Trial No.0597 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No.76 of 2024, under Sections 376, 342, 323, 504, and 506 IPC and Section 3(1) (da) of SC/ST Act, Police Station New Madhuban, District Mau whereby the discharge application of the appellant has been rejected. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the impugned order. Impugned order itself reflects that charges against the accused have already been framed and the grounds taken for discharge cannot be considered at this stage as truthfulness, sufficiency and acceptability of the evidence produced by the accused can be adjudged during trial. The impugned order passed by the court below is well in conformity in law and does not suffer from error of illegality, irregularity and warrant any interference by this Court. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer to set aside the impugned order as mentioned above is hereby refused. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that directions may be given to the court below to consider the bail application of the appellant in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Chaturvedi, Vishesh Rajvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anshu Pandey @ Vivek Kumar Pandey .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the present appeal is disposed of with the direction that in case the appellant filed bail application before the court below, the same shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law. 7. With the above observations, this appeal is disposed of finally. September 9, 2025 Ajeet CRLA No. 6758 of 2025 2 (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJEET KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad