IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (107) CWP-20637-2025 Date of decision:- 05.09.2025 Jarina ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Vishneet Singh Kathpal, Advocate (through VC) for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. By making a reference to the speaking order dated 12.08.2025, State counsel submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been inquired into and as there is a matrimonial dispute between the parties, representation has been filed. He submits that simultaneously police authorities have been directed to ensure that a regular beat patrolling/mobile patrolling of the area, where the petitioner resides, be done and her safety be ensured. 2. As the representation has been decided, writ petition is disposed of. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 05.09.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.09.05 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment