Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81693 (KAR)

SRI. NAGARAJA REDDY v. SMT. JAYAMMA

WP/12272/2019 · 2025-07-30

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29464 WP No. 12272 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 12272 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAGARAJA REDDY S/O LATE SRI. RAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 2. SRI. VISHWANATHA REDDY S/O LATE SRI. RAMASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3. SRI. PRAKASH REDDY S/O LATE SRI. RAMASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 4. SRI. MUNI REDDY S/O LATE SRI. MUNIVENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 5. SRI. AMARESHA REDDY S/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 6. SRI. RAMESH REDDY S/O LATE SAMPANGIRAMASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KAGGALIPURA VILLAGE SARAJAPURA HOBLI, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29464 WP No. 12272 of 2019 ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 562 125. …PETITIONERS (P1 TO P6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) AND: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE BHADRAIAH REDDY @ BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, 2. SMT. B. NANJAMMA D/O LATE BHADRAIAH REDDY @ BHADRA REDDY W/O SRI. NARAYAN REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 3. SRI. B NANJUNDA REDDY S/O LATE BHADRAIAH REDDY @ BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 4. SRI. B VEERABHADRAPPA S/O LATE BHADRAIAH REDDY @ BHADRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SL. NO. 1 TO 4 ARE R/AT CHINTHALAMADIVALA VILLAGE SARAJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU - 562 125. 5. SRI. M.R. PRASHANTH S/O SRI M.R. SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT KUDLU VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29464 WP No. 12272 of 2019 ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 125. 6. SRI. S.L. RAVISHANKAR REDDY S/O S.R. LOKESHWARA REDDY AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO. 54, ORIENT PRESS COMPOUND, NEAR SUBBAIAH CIRCLE, LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 027. 7. SMT. C.G. MAHALAKSHMI W/O SRI. BETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 258, 10TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, MSR NAGAR, NEAR LAKSHMI TENT, MATHIKERE POST, BENGALURU - 560 054. 8. SRI. VINAY S.A, S/O SRI. S.V. ANAND AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT VIKRAM VASVI MAHAL ROAD CROSS, CHITRADURGA - 577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.B. TOTAD, ADVOCATE AND SRI. SUDHEERA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 AND R4 (ABSENT); R2, R6, R7 - ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE AT ANEKAL, IN R.A.NO.5016/2016 AND ETC., - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29464 WP No. 12272 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER None appeared for the petitioners. 2. While perusing the documents, it is observed that on 15.07.2025, a memo was filed along with the postal track status report which indicates that the notice of retirement was served on the petitioners. In view of the same, the petitioners' counsel was permitted to retire from the case. Accordingly, this Court has permitted the retirement of the counsel. Thereafter, the matter is listed to show the names of the petitioners in the cause list. 3. The matter is posted today and none appeared for the petitioners and it is observed that the retirement notice of the counsel was also received by the petitioners on 19.06.2025. Till date, the petitioners neither came forward to appear personally before this Court nor engaged any counsel for adjudicating their case. It - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29464 WP No. 12272 of 2019 appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT: BHK