IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 209 Raju and others Ram Pal and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated as “Ram Pal vs. Raju and others” vide which while notice of motion was issued, the parties were directed to maintain status quo as exists on the date of passing of the order dated 05.7.2023, with regard to the property in question. violation of the said order, the respon construction on the suit premises (Annexures P of the order dated 1.5.2025 passed in the aforesaid Civil Revision COCP-2706-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2706 of 2023 Date of decision : Raju and others Versus Ram Pal and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Ketan Antil, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated 05.7.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed in Ram Pal vs. Raju and others” vide which while notice of motion s issued, the parties were directed to maintain status quo as exists on the date of passing of the order dated 05.7.2023, with regard to the property in question. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in violation of the said order, the respon construction on the suit premises, as evident from the photographs (Annexures P-4). Learned counsel for respondent No.1 hands over a copy of the order dated 1.5.2025 passed in the aforesaid Civil Revision 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2706 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-19.09.2025 …..Petitioners …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the interim ) passed in CR-2557-2023 titled Ram Pal vs. Raju and others” vide which while notice of motion s issued, the parties were directed to maintain status quo as exists on the date of passing of the order dated 05.7.2023, with regard to the Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in violation of the said order, the respondents were carrying on as evident from the photographs Learned counsel for respondent No.1 hands over a copy of the order dated 1.5.2025 passed in the aforesaid Civil Revision VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document No.2557 of 2023, whereby as the possession of the respondents over the suit property was not proved. The copy of the said order is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. accordingly the allegation of violation made by the petitioner is unfounded. It is also pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.1 that the petitioner has also filed a petition under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC for punishing respon injunction granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 20.1.2022 passed by the said is a separate cause of action. counsel for respondent No.1, the present contempt petition is dismissed. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2706-2023 (O & M) No.2557 of 2023, whereby the said civil revision has been dismissed as the possession of the respondents over the suit property was not The copy of the said order is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. accordingly the allegation of violation made by the petitioner is unfounded. It is also pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.1 that the petitioner has also filed a petition under Order 39 Rule A CPC for punishing respondent No.1 for violating the ad interim injunction granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 20.1.2022 passed by the Civil Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the said is a separate cause of action. Heard. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for respondent No.1, the present contempt petition is dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. September 19, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 the said civil revision has been dismissed as the possession of the respondents over the suit property was not The copy of the said order is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that accordingly the allegation of violation made by the petitioner is unfounded. It is also pointed out by learned counsel for respondent No.1 that the petitioner has also filed a petition under Order 39 Rule dent No.1 for violating the ad interim injunction granted in favour of the petitioner vide order dated etitioner also submits that the n view the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for respondent No.1, the present contempt petition is Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.24 09.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document