108 AMARJIT SINGH STATE OF CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1 submits that the petitioner intends to approach respondents by filing an appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance as raised in the present petition and the respondents be directed to bound manner. 2. 3. of the respondent filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration, the same will be decided within a period of by passing a speaking order and in case, the claim of the petitioner is found feasible, the same will be accepted otherwise, for not accepting the claim of the petitioner, which will be conveyed to the petitioner for his infor IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.35705 of 2025 Date of Decision : AMARJIT SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. S.K Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach respondents by filing an appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance as raised in the present petition and the respondents be directed to bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab of the respondent-State and submits that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration, the same will be decided within a period of 8 weeks from the r by passing a speaking order and in case, the claim of the petitioner is found feasible, the same will be accepted otherwise, for not accepting the claim of the petitioner, which will be conveyed to the petitioner for his information and necessary action. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.35705 of 2025 Date of Decision : 21.07.2026 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. S.K Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach respondents by filing an appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance as raised in the present petition and the respondents be directed to decide the same in a time ahul Rampal, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf State and submits that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration, the same will from the receipt of copy of this order by passing a speaking order and in case, the claim of the petitioner is found feasible, the same will be accepted otherwise, due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner, which will be conveyed to the mation and necessary action. arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to approach respondents by filing an appropriate representation for redressal of his grievance as raised in the decide the same in a time accepts notice on behalf State and submits that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner and the same is pending consideration, the same will order by passing a speaking order and in case, the claim of the petitioner is found reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioner, which will be conveyed to the SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.21 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.35705 of 2025 -2- 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in view the view the statement of the learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty as prayed for. 5. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 21-07-2026 Sapna Goyal (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.21 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document