Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010019062014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/5557/2017 SANJIB DAIMARI and 7 ORS. S/O SRI CHABIN DAIMARI R/O VILL-KHALOIBURI PO and PS- KHETRI DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM 2: BHASKAR JYOTI GOGOI S/O- SRI GOGON GOGOI R/O- VILL- BALIJAN SAIDING P.O- BISMILE DIST- DIBRUGARH 3: DIBYA JYOTI BORTHAKUR S/O- MR. KALIPROSAD BORTHAKUR R/O- VILL- KUMARGAON P.O- DERGAON DIST- GOLAGHAT ASSAM 4: RAJIB DEKA S/O- SATYA DEKA R/O- VILL- MILANPUR P.O- PATHSALA DIST- BARPETA ASSAM 5: NIPA BARMAN W/O- BIPUL BARMAN VILL- CHAMATA P.S- BELSOR DIST- NALBARI Page No.# 2/4 PIN- 781304 6: MUSSADDIN AHMED S/O- MAHIUDDIN BARBHUYA VILL- MATIJURI PIN- 788155 DIST- HAILAKANDI 7: VIVEK KUMAR UPADHYAYA S/O- GD UPADHYAYA R/O- CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 7 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 2:THE LEGISLATIVE DEPTT. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GHY- 06 3:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONADRY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 ASSAM 4:THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION REP. BY THE CHAIRPERSON HANS BHAWAN WING-II 1 BAHADUR SHAH JAFAR MARG NEW DELHI- 110002 5:THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHERS EDUCATION EASTERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE REP. BY THE CHAIRPERSON BHUBANESWAR REGIONAL DIRECTOR 15 NEEL KANTH NAGAR NAYAPALI BHUBANESWAR- 750102 Page No.# 3/4 6:THE RASTRIYA MADHYAMIK SIKSHA ABHIYAN REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19 7:THE EMPOWERED COMMITTEE FOR TET REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 8:THE MEMBER SECRETARY EMPOWERED COMMITTEE FOR TET FOR SECONADRY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY- 19 ------------ For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. B.P. Borah, Advocate For respondent(s) : Mr. N.J. Khataniar, SC, Education Mr. I. Alam, NCTE – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 13.05.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) This petition is filed by the petitioners being aggrieved with the action of the State Government, whereby it has made mandatory for the petitioners to clear the TET examination for the purpose of appointment on the post of Assistant Teachers in High and Higher Secondary Schools in the State of Assam. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that since the Rules, by which the above provision was made, has already been repealed and new Rules have come into force and, in the meantime, the services of the petitioners have also been regularized, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition. However, so far as the remaining grievance of Page No.# 4/4 the petitioners is concerned, such as, pensionary benefits and other claims, the petitioners have already approached this Court and their claim is under consideration. Learned counsel has therefore, submitted that this writ petition may be disposed of in the above terms. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, if the writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. In such circumstance, this writ petition is disposed of. However, disposal of the writ petition will not affect the merit of the case, which has been filed by the petitioners claiming pensionary benefits and other benefits and is pending consideration before this Court. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant