Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81671 (PNJ)

KULWANT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7890/2025 · 2025-07-23

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-7890 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Kulwant Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos. for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who the behest of respondent no. harass and th 2. pending before the Civil Courts at Ludhiana between the petitioner and respondent no.6, however, respondent no.6 is bent upon to take f possession of the land of the petitioner in connivance with respondent nos.4 and 5 and is submitted a complaint/representation dated respondents no. 3. 4. respondent-State. 7890-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kulwant Singh Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos. for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who the behest of respondent no.6 and also to direct respondent nos.4 and 5 not to harass and threat him on the instructions of respondent no.6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pending before the Civil Courts at Ludhiana between the petitioner and respondent no.6, however, respondent no.6 is bent upon to take f possession of the land of the petitioner in connivance with respondent nos.4 is continuously harassing and threatening him. submitted a complaint/representation dated no.2 & 3 but no action has been taken till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7890-2025 Decided on:23.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondent nos.2 & for protection of life and liberty of the petitioner who is apprehending danger at 6 and also to direct respondent nos.4 and 5 not to reat him on the instructions of respondent no.6. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that a land dispute is pending before the Civil Courts at Ludhiana between the petitioner and respondent no.6, however, respondent no.6 is bent upon to take forcible possession of the land of the petitioner in connivance with respondent nos.4 continuously harassing and threatening him. The petitioner has submitted a complaint/representation dated 16.07.2025 (Annexure P-2) to t no action has been taken till date. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the ...Petitioner ...Respondents /227 & 3 apprehending danger at 6 and also to direct respondent nos.4 and 5 not to a land dispute is pending before the Civil Courts at Ludhiana between the petitioner and orcible possession of the land of the petitioner in connivance with respondent nos.4 The petitioner has ) to Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.25 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-7890 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to 6. the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. July 23, 2025 vinod* 7890-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna decide the representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and grant him protection, if any threat to his life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna ) of the petitioner and grant him liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a to ) of the petitioner and grant him It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by him. VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.25 10:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document