SUNIL GANGADHAR PATIL v. SURESH TRYAMBAK CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS
WP/2036/2016 · 2025-08-08
Shri Neeraj P Dhote
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8167 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 901.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO. 2036 OF 2016 SUNIL GANGADHAR PATIL VERSUS SURESH TRYAMBAK CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patil Sandesh R. Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Pravin D. Biradar h/f. Mr. Chaudhary Vikramsingh T. AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 : Mr. A.R. Kale … CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.
DATE : 08.08.2025
PER COURT :
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that this petition was directed against the interim order passed in RTS Appeal No. 487/2015 and the said appeal has been finally heard and disposed of by respondent no. 3. He further submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of.
2. Learned Advocate Mr. Biradar holding for Mr. Chaudhary, appears for respondent no. 1. None for respondent no. 2. Learned AGP appears for respondent nos. 3 to 5.
3. In view of the above submissions made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.
( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) spc/- 2025:BHC-AUG:22222