- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 10056 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT S H SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE SHIVARUDRA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 2. SRI. S.NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE SHIVARUDRA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 3. SMT. RENUKAMMA W/O LATE VEERABHADRAIAH, D/O RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 4. SRI. K.R.SHIVASHANKARAIAH S/O RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.312, ANCHEPALYA, KENGERI HOBLI, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU- 560074 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAYEEM PASHA S.,ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI GURULINGAIAH S/O SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/OF KODIYALA VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK. 2. SRI. K.S.PUTTAREVAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/OF YOGESHWARA EXTENSION, 5TH CROSS, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANGARA TALUK. 3. SRI. MUNIVENKATABHOVI DEAD BY HIS LRS. 3(A) SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O MUNIVENKATABHOVI AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 3(B) SMT. GIRIJAMMA W/O SUBRAMANYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3(C) SRI. VENKATESHA S/O LATE MUNIVENKATABHOVI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, THE ABOVE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT MARLAMIDODDI VILLAGE, KODIYALA HARENAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH / SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02/08/2024 PASSED IN MISC. NO. 16/2013, BY THE HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT RAMANAGARA, VIDE ANNX-A AND RESTORE THE MISC. NO. 16/2013 BEFORE THE HONBLE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA TO PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CONTEST THE MATTER ON MERITS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Order dated 05.09.2025 reads thus: "Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution." In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuring days of the respective matters being given". - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42414 WP No. 10056 of 2025 There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out today. It appears, the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16