Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81659 (KAR)

CHANNABASAPPA LINGAPPA MOKHASHI v. SMT. SUNITHA K.

CCC/438/2025 · 2025-09-03

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34796-DB CCC No. 438 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 438 OF 2025 BETWEEN: CHANNABASAPPA LINGAPPA MOKHASHI, S/O LATE LINGAPPA MOKHASHI, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.3138/2, WARD NO.19, S.Y.M. SAUNDATTI YELLAMMA MUNICIPALITY, RAMAPUR SITE, SAUNDATTI, BELGAUM DISTRICT - 591 126. AADHAR CARD BEARING NO. 2608 0572 3477 MOBILE NO. 94482 30792 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI ANGADI S V, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SUNITHA K, W/O LATE SATHYANARAYANA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, INCHARGE SECRETARY, THE KARNATAKA STATE BAR COUNCIL, OLD ELECTION COMMISSIONS' OFFICE, DR B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGLAURU-560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI NATARAJ G, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE PETITION WITH DIRECTIONS TO SUMMON THE Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34796-DB CCC No. 438 of 2025 ACCUSED, THE ACCUSED MAY KINDLY BE DIRECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE (HON'BLE JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA IN WP NO.2156/2024 (GM- RES) DATED 28.06.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ALSO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.1322/2024 DATED 13.12.2024 (ANNEXURE-F). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in terms of the order dated 23.08.2025, the sanad was handed over to the complainant and there is no impediment in continuing his practice and he has also been restored on the roll of advocates. 2. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed and the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62