Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81656 (PNJ)

VISHAL SATINDER SOOD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/40557/2025 · 2025-09-25

Yashvir Singh Rathor

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-40557-2025(O&M) 1 127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 25.09.2025 1. CRM-M-40557-2025(O&M) VISHAL SATINDER SOOD ...Petitioner/applicant VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents 2. CRM-M-40685-2025(O&M) VISHAL SATINDER SOOD ...Petitioner/applicant VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present: Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, DAG, Haryana. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR , J. (Oral) CRM-38298-2025 and CRM-38518-2025 The applicant through instant applications is seeking permission to withdraw the main petitions on the basis of settlement between the parties. In view of prayer made in the applications, same are allowed and main cases are taken on Board today itself. Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.26 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40557-2025(O&M) 2 CRM-M-40557-2025(O&M) & CRM-M-40685-2025(O&M) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the institution of the petitions, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and he seeks to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh, in case, the compromise subsequently fails. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 3. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 25.09.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.26 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document