Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81655 (MAD)

A.SAMRAJ v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/21092/2025 · 2025-09-09

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL OP No. 21092 of 2025 A.Samraj ...Petitioner(s) Vs State, Rep by The Inspector of Police, G-10, Anaikattu Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Crime No. 135 of 2025 ...Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.135 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.K. Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1\4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER The petitioner who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 329(3), 115(2) and 351(2) of BNS in Crime No.135 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that when the petitioner met the defacto complainant's daughter, he heated exchange ensued, leading to a scuffle between both side, resulting in mutual assault and chaos. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to previous enemity, a complaint has been given. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the accused trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and already a complaint was lodged against the accused with respect to causing disturbance to the daughter of the defacto complainant. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioners. 2\4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the gravity of offfences, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-09-2025 mps To 1.The Inspector of Police, G-10, Anaikattu Police Station, Chengalpattu District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Note: Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2.All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the Official Website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR Code. 3\4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. mps CRL OP No. 21092 of 2025 09.09.2025 4\4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis