[2025:RJ-JP:11170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2694/2025 Govind Singh Naruka @ Govind Banna S/o Shree Samundra Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Hadoti, Dhuwakala Tehsil Devli, Police Station Ghaad, District Tonk At Present R/o Plot No. 172, Prem Nagar, Vishvkarma Road Number-17, Police Station Vishvkarma, Jaipur- West. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.313/2023 registered at Police Station Murlipura, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that admittedly, no contraband has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been made accused in this case solely on the basis of interrogation of co-accused persons, who were found in possession of the alleged contraband. He further submits that co-accused persons have [2025:RJ-JP:11170] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2694/2025] already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He contends that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 13.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that one other criminal has been registered under the NDPS Act against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that no contraband has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner; co- accused persons, who were found in possession of the contraband, have already granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Govind Singh Naruka @ Govind Banna S/o Shree Samundra Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the [2025:RJ-JP:11170] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2694/2025] matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/149