1 2025:CGHC:46490 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1019 of 2022 * - Ramavatar Ram S/o Late Shri Mukhdev, Aged About 62 Years R/o. Village Bhadesar, Post Avadan, Tahsil Kasimabaad, Police Station Mohammadabaad, District Gajipur (Uttar Pradesh) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - Director General Railway Protection Force (RPF), Railway Board, New Delhi 2 - Inspector General (IG), Co-Head Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force (RPF), South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Protection Commissioner, Railway Protection Force (RPF), SECR, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Divisional Security Commissioner (DSC), Railway Protection Force (RPF), Premises Of DRM, Near R.V.H. Colony, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Chandra Prakash Col, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10(i) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release all the retiral dues to the Petitioner i.e. Family Pension, Gratuity, GPF, GIS, Leave Encashment, Arrears of Pay Scale and other retiral dues with 10% interest to the petitioner. 10.(ii)That this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to direct respondents to give suitable compensation to the petitioners for Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.09.12 19:37:21 +0530 2 the mental trauma and agony, harassment and hardships suffered by them as also cost of the litigation. 2. Ms. Anuja Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the admissible retiral dues have already been paid to the petitioner and documents in this regard have been placed on record along with an application dated 05.05.2023. She would submit that the answering respondents have given details of the amount paid to the petitioner at page no. 20 and 21, 3. Considering the documents placed on record by the answering respondents, this petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti