- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29319 CRL.A No. 1944 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1944 OF 2022 (A) BETWEEN: SRI NAZIM S/O AMJAD HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/A NO.43, IST MAIN 2ND CROSS, SEETHAPPA LAYOUT OPP ACHARYA COLLEGE CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI R T NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 032 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAMAMURTHY H S., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI SAGEER AHMED S/O NASEER AHAMED AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/A NO.1474, 7TH CROSS MANJUNATHA LAYOUT BANGALORE-560 032 …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.05.2022 PASSED IN C.C.NO.22889/2017 BY THE XV ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU AND TO ALLOW THE SAID COMPLAINT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29319 CRL.A No. 1944 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. Today, the matter is listed for non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. However, learned counsel for the appellant remained absent. Office objections are not complied in spite of sufficient time having been given for compliance of office objections. It appears that the learned counsel for the appellant is not interested to proceed with the case. Therefore, it is appropriate to dismiss the Criminal Appeal for non-compliance of office objections. 2. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7