Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81606 (PNJ)

SITA RAM v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

RFA/10605/2014 · 2025-07-25

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA Sita Ram State of Punjab and Another CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) No. 6957 of 2013 July 25, 2025 'Sumit Gusain' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 Vs. State of Punjab and Another CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landown X-objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1. (in RFA-10437-2014). Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in No. 6957 of 2013 titled “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others” July 25, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA) 'Sumit Gusain' Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-10605-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.07.2025 .......... Appellant .......... Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. H.K. Aurora, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Bansal, Advocate, Mr. Hemant Sarin, Advocate, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Kanojia, Advocate, Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant(s)/landowners/ objectors/respondent(s). Mr. Bhanu Partap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Gunjan Mehta, AAG, Punjab. For detailed order, see judgment of even date passed in RFA “Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others”. ( HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No .......... Appellant .......... Respondents RFA . SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.08.05 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document