HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29564 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. As per copy of the compliance affidavit filed by learned A.G.A., notice is personally served upon opposite party no.2. However, despite service of notice, no one has put in appearance on his behalf. 2. Learned A.G.A. has raised preliminary objection qua maintainability of the instant application on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy to file an appeal u/s 14(A) of the S.C./S.T. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has not refuted the objection raised by the learned A.G.A. 4. As such, instant application is dismissed having been not maintainable, on the ground of availability of alternative remedy, as mentioned above. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents annexed with instant application to learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining its photostat copy at a relevant place. September 22, 2025 Sumit K. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Quasim Khan, Shams Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Rahul .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad