DILSHADA BANOO AND ANR. v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ORS. (HOME)
WP(C)/1635/2025 · 2025-07-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8160 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8160 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No.13 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1635/2025 CM(4215/2025) DILSHADA BANOO AND ANR. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Faizan Majid, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ORS. (HOME) ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,JUDGE
ORDER 21-07-2025
1. This Court, vide order dated 15.07.2025, directed the petitioners to produce the original documents in order to authenticate their age, with a further direction to remain present before the Court on the next date of hearing.
2. However, neither the said documents have been brought on record nor have the petitioners appeared in person. There is also no representation on their behalf. Prima facie, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 21-07-2025 Mubashir