Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8160 (AP)

Guntaboina Srinu v. IDBI Bank Limited,

WP/28671/2013 · 2025-07-08

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010086212013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28671/2013 Between: 1. GUNTABOINA SRINU, S/O. BANGARAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-1/2, GOLLAVANITHIPPA VILLAGE, BHIMAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. IDBI BANK LIMITED, 46-22-11, Karri Surrireddy Plaza, Danavai Peta, Park Road, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent Bank in proposing to publish the name and photograph giving other personal details in the leading newspapers/magazines pursuant to letter Ref.No.IDBI/PSG/ FLR/2013-14/10 dated 12-09-2013 as illegal, arbitrary and without any authority and law, and contrary to the Reserve Bank of India Guidelines and Articles 21 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 35591 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Bank not to publish the name and photograph giving other personal details in leading newspapers/magazines pursuant to Letter in 2 Ref.No.IDBI/PSG/FLR/2013-14/10 dated 12-09-2013 pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Ch.Ashok, learned counsel representing Sri P.Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.07.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 28671/2013 Date: 09.07.2025 KA 4