Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52149 WP No. 40249 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 40249 OF 2013 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
MAHADEVA AGED 69 YEARS, S/O LATE MADE GOWDA, R/O NO.326, BEHIND JSS COLLEGE ROAD, V.VAKKALAGERI, NANJANGUD, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LAKSHMAN RAO, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C., MYSORE RURAL DIVISION, MYSORE-570 017.
2.
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE P.G. ACT OF 1972, MYSORE DIVISION, MYSORE.
3.
THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER & APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE P.G.ACT OF 1972 (MYSORE REGION),REGION-2, KARMEEKARA BHAVAN, BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI K.R.RAJENDRA, AGA FOR R2 AND R3)
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52149 WP No. 40249 of 2013
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the matter was listed at intervals. At request, on behalf of the petitioner, matter was adjourned.
3. Further, when the matter was listed on 12.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was ordered to be listed on 19.11.2025. On 19.11.2025, counsel Sri.R.Somasundar, appeared and sought time stating that he would get ready and argue the matter. Taking note of the said submission, it was ordered to be listed today i.e.,
10.12.2025. Accordingly, Registry has listed the matter today.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52149 WP No. 40249 of 2013
4. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Despite granting several opportunities, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43