- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4653 RP No. 100175 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA REVIEW PETITION NO. 100175 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN: SMT. PIDIKITI VARAMMA W/O. P. MALYADRI, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: D. NO. 10-03-70, WARD NO. 9 KOTAREDDY NAGAR, TQ: KANDUKAR, DIST: PRAKASHAM, A. P. STATE - 523105 NOW RESIDING AT: NADAVI VILLAGE, TQ; SIRUGUPPA, DIST: BALLARI BY HER GPA HOLDER, D. SATYANARAYAN S/O. LATE KOTESHWAR RAO, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: D.NO.86,/1052, V.V. NAGAR, BALLARI ROAD, SIRAGUPPA – 583121. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. S. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI. MARREDDY VENKATA RAMI REDDY, S/O. M. PEDDA VENKATESHWARALU ALIAS D. VENKT RAMI REDDY, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O: D. NO.429, HMT COLONY, MIYAPUR, SERILINGAMPULLY, R.R. DISTRICT - A P. PIN – 500001. …RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE (1) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 26.03.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN RFA NO.4046/2012, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4653 RP No. 100175 of 2024 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on the Review Petition as well as on I.A.1/2024. Perused the grounds made out for reviewing the judgment dated 26.03.2024, which was passed on merits after hearing the learned counsel for both the parties, which resulted in allowing the appeal, setting aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court, and also accepting the finding recorded by the Trial Court on Additional Issue No.2. 2. The grounds now urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner to review the petition amounts to rewriting of the judgment, which is not permissible in law. When both the parties are heard and the appeal came to be disposed of on merits by assigning reasons, I do not find any reason to review the same. 3. Hence, Review Petition is dismissed. Consequently, I.A.1/2024 also stands dismissed. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE gab CT:ANB/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11