IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 CWP-20516-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:24.07.2025 AKASHDEEP HOSPITAL, AMRITSAR ... Petitioner V/S UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.S. Talwar, Advocate Mr. A.S. Rawaley, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Senior Panel Counsel for UOI. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) CM-10384-CWP-2025 1. Application is allowed, as prayed for. 2. Annexures P-41 and P-42 are taken on record. Main case. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has contended that the impugned notice, Annexure P-38, which has been issued by the respondents in implementation of the judgment passed by this Court, is not determinative of the procedure prescribed under the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the parties. He urges that as the prescribed procedure has been breached, impugned show cause notice, Annexure P- 40, cannot be sustained. Pooja Saini 2025.07.29 10:14 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment CWP-20516-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. After having addressed for some time, learned senior counsel states that petitioner has not submitted reply to the impugned show cause notice. He seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the writ petition to submit response to Annexure P-40, by raising all the objections including that of violation of the procedure, as prescribed in the MOA and requests for extension of time. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. However, time period for responding to the impugned show cause notice is extended till 05.08.2025. 24.07.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) pooja saini JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.07.29 10:14 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment