- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42417 WP No. 8880 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.8880 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. SHANTHA KUMARI W/O GOVINDARAJU AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.26, 20TH CROSS, RAJA RAJESHWARI NILAYA, KARAGAPPA GARDEN, SAMPANGI RAMA NAGARA, BANGALORE- 560 027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED UMMER., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. KUM JAGADHEESWARI D/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 2. SMT. DAIVANI W/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 3. SRI KUMAR S/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 4. SMT. SARASWATHI D/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 5. SMT. DEVI D/O LATE SUBRAMANI Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42417 WP No. 8880 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 6. GANGA D/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 7. KAVERI D/O LATE SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS ALL SL.NO.1 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT NO.64, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BINNYPETE, MARKANDESWARANAGARA, BANGALORE- 560 023. 8. KUM. SHANTHI D/O LATE CHINNATHAMBI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 9. SMT. RANI D/O LATE CHINNATHAMBI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS ALL SL.NO.8 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT NO.57, 3RD CROSS, SAI BABA NAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 021. 10. SMT. CHIKATHAYAMMA W/O T GIRIGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 9/2, 5TH MAIN, BHUVANESHWARI NAGARA, KEMPAPURA AGRAHARA, BANGALORE - 560 023. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUING AN ORDER/DIRECTION OF SPEEDY TRAIL .I.E. TO ADJUDICATE THE MATTER IN 90 DAYS WHICH IS PENDING IN FILE VIDE O.S - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42417 WP No. 8880 of 2025 NO 9490/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF XLIV ADDL, CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH 45) THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Order dated 15.09.2025 reads thus: "Ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the petition stands dismissed for its non-prosecution." In the event they stand complied as on today, those matters shall be listed on the ensuring days of the respective matters being given". There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out today. It appears, the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE HR