M/S NASEER HUMAYUN v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
WP/10608/2025 · 2025-10-09
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39973 WP No. 10608 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 10608 OF 2025 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN:
M/S NASEER HUMAYUN NOW AS M/S M.D. ENTERPRISES, PLOT NO CA 3-P3, 100 FT. ROAD, VASANTHANARASAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA, 1ST PHASE, KIADB, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR - 572 128 BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. MOHAMED WAZEED S/O MOHAMED RIYAZ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD BY ITS SECRETARY, KHANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER K.I.A.D.B., ZONAL OFFICE, MARUTHI BUILDINGS, B.H. ROAD, TUMKURU-572 103.
3.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KIADB, KHANIJA BHAVAN, BENGALURU.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39973 WP No. 10608 of 2025
4.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KIADB, MARUTHI GROUP BUILDINGS, 2ND FLOOR, B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU-572 103.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C. CHANNE GOWDA., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 07.10.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNX-E GIVEN TO R-2 AND REPRESENTATION DTD. 21.10.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNX-F GIVEN TO THE R-3 TO ALLOT 0.5 ACRES OF LAND TO THE PETITIONER BY ISSUING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; i. Direct the respondents to consider the Representation of the petitioner dated 07.10.2024, produced at Annexure-E given to R2 and representation dated 21.10.2024 produced at Annexure-F given to the R3 to allot 0.5 acres of land to the petitioner by issuing a writ of mandamus.
ii. Issue such other writ, order or direction this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
2. Sri C. Channe Gowda, learned counsel, who has entered an appearance for Respondent No.3
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39973 WP No. 10608 of 2025
undertakes to appear for Respondents No.1, 2 and 4 also.
3. The Petitioner having made an application for allotment of 2.00 acres of land and 1.5 acres of land has been allotted. Hence, the Petitioner made a representation on 07.10.2024 for allotment of balance of 0.5 acre of land. The same not having been considered and no order having been passed. Hence, the Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.
4. A representation having been made on 07.10.2024. It was required for the respondents to pass necessary orders on the same, either accepting or rejecting the representation within a reasonable period of time. Neither having been done. I pass the following:
ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39973 WP No. 10608 of 2025
ii. A mandamus was issued directing Respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 07.10.2024 and 21.10.2024 at Annexures-A & F respectively and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40