Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81572 (PNJ)

HARKIRAT SINGH v. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CWP/22780/2025 · 2025-08-07

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22780-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CWP-22780-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.08.2025 Harkirat Singh ... Petitioner Versus Union Territory of Chandigarh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Himanshu Trehan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the respondents -M.C., Chandigarh. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA J. (ORAL) 1. The orders under challenge in the present writ petition are appealable under the statute. The alternative remedy so provided has not been availed. The primary reason for filing of the present writ petition, without availing the alternative remedy, is that the limitation for filing of appeal has expired. 2. Since various factual issues are also raised in the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the remedy of appeal. The writ petition in such circumstances is not entertained and is dismissed. SATYAWAN 2025.08.08 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22780-2025 (O&M) 2 3. It is however provided that if appeal is filed within two weeks from today, the same shall be entertained on merits. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) 07.08.2025 JUDGE Satyawan Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SATYAWAN 2025.08.08 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document