- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44628 CRL.P No. 10228 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10228 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR. VASU N., S/O LATE K. NARAYAN, AGE ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.E22, 3RD ‘A’ CROSS, MANYATA RESIDENCY, HEBBAL RING ROAD, NAGAWARA, BENGALURU-560094. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANGAD KAMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SAMPIGEHALLI P.S., REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU–560 001. 2. M/S. SACHIN KHIMJI INVESTORS AND REALTORS LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BINNY CRESCENT APARTMENTS 15-A, BLOCK-D, BENSON CROSS ROAD, BENGALURU -560 046. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44628 CRL.P No. 10228 of 2025 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. SACHIN KHIMJI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.PC (FILED UNDER SECTION 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.06.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXIV ASCJ AND ACMM, BENGLAURU IN C.C.NO.6109/2018 FURNISHED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-A, WHEREBY THE LEARNED TRIAL JUDGE HAS ISSUED A FINE LEVY WARRANT AND A NON-BAILABLE WARRANT AGAINST THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo along with the order passed by this Court in Criminal Revision Petition No.1048/2025, wherein the sentence imposed was suspended, and copy of the order sheet in C.C.No.6109 of 2018 recalling the NBW. The learned counsel would submit that he has already complied with the condition of the order passed by this Court and submits that this petition will not survive for consideration. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44628 CRL.P No. 10228 of 2025 2. The petition does not survive for consideration in view of the order passed in revision petition as well as recalling the order of NBW. Hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78