- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28297 WP No. 662 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.662 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAGANGAIAH S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, MARALUDEVANAPURA CHAKRABHAVI POST, MADABAL HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDESH KUMAR M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, 2ND STAGE DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU -560001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159. 3. THE TAHASILDHAR MAGADI TALUK MAGADI, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28297 WP No. 662 of 2024 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 11.12.2018, 13.06.2019, 10.07.2019 AND 04.01.2022 WHICH WERE PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-K, K1, K2 AND K3. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Manjunath K., learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non-consideration of representations dated 11.12.2018, 13.06.2019, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28297 WP No. 662 of 2024 10.07.2019 and 04.01.2022 produced at Annexures-K, K1, K2 and K3, seeking to conduct phodi and durast in respect of the subject land. 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, and the learned Additional Government Advocate, the petitioner is permitted to approach the respondent- authorities through the online portal. If such a representation is submitted, the same shall be considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB