MAHAK SINGH v. UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
WPSB/537/2016 · 2025-03-19
Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 815 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 815 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPSB 537/2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
(2) Mr. D.K. Joshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, makes statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time and it may be dismissed as such. (3) Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
19.3.2025 Pr