NASRU v. M/S GILL SANDHU CARGO MOVERS PVT LTD & ANR
FAO/2236/2018 · 2025-08-27
Pankaj Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81480 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81480 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 266 FAO-2236-2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.08.2025 Nasru ...... Appellant versus M/s Gill Sandhu Cargo Movers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Rajbir Wasu, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. Counsel for the appellant does not dispute that the show cause notice with respect to penalty is pending before the Commissioner and the liability has to be borne by the employer. Apart from the issue of penalty pending before the Commissioner, there is no scope for enhancement.
3. Counsel for the appellant thus prays for withdrawal of the appeal.
4. Allowed as prayed for.
5. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off.
(PANKAJ JAIN) 27.08.2025
JUDGE Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.08.28 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document