147 U.T., ADMINISTRATION THROUGH SECRETARYAND ANOTHER CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. dated 17.12.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P passed by the Central Administrat referred as “Tribunal”) in Original Application No.060/000395/2024 titled “Hari Mohan Vs. U.T., Administration and ors”. 2. submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further. 3. 4. 20-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21970 Date of Decision : U.T., ADMINISTRATION THROUGH SECRETARYAND ANOTHER VERSUS CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 17.12.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred as “Tribunal”) in Original Application No.060/000395/2024 titled “Hari Mohan Vs. U.T., Administration and ors”. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 21970-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.07.2026 U.T., ADMINISTRATION THROUGH SECRETARYAND ........Petitioners VERSUS CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH AND ........Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL s. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Mr. Abhishek Premi, Advocate for the petitioners. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) In the present petition, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 17.12.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P ive Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred as “Tribunal”) in Original Application No.060/000395/2024 titled “Hari Mohan Vs. U.T., Administration and ors”. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO U.T., ADMINISTRATION THROUGH SECRETARYAND Petitioners CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH AND ........Respondents In the present petition, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 17.12.2025, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-1, ive Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred as “Tribunal”) in Original Application No.060/000395/2024 titled After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been ) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.21 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document