Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8148 (JK)

ABDUL RASHID HAJAM AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT)

WP(C)/1645/2025 · 2025-07-21

Vinod Chatterji Koul

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 18 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1645/2025 Abdul Rashid Hajam and Ors. …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Syed Sajad Geelani, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahangeer Ahmad Dar, GA CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE O R D E R 21.07.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for a while, submits that petitioners would be satisfied in case representation made by them to the respondents for the relief claimed in the writ petition is decided within fixed time frame. Notice. Mr. Jahangeer Ahmad Dar accepts notice. He submits that representation, if any, made by petitioners would be considered in accordance with the provisions of law for the relief claimed by petitioners in the said representation. In view of above, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider and decide the representation, if any, made by petitioners, of course, in accordance with rules governing the field and let such consideration be accorded within a period of three months from the date copy of this order along with complete paper book is served upon respondents. While considering the case of petitioners, respondents may also hear them. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 21.07.2025 Misba