Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81477 (ALL)

BEENU YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/11168/2025 · 2025-08-05

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132679 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11168 of 2025 Petitioner :- Beenu Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh,Surendra Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rakesh Kumar Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground after the death of her husband, who was an employee of respondent university on Class-IV post (daily wager). (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 2 and 4 respectively to decide the application dated 31.01.2025 and 26.11.2024 as well as application dated 20.07.2024 given to the respondents officer." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2 and 3 and a direction may be issued to them to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no. 2 & 3 within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no. 2-Chandra Shekhar Azad Agricultural and Technological University, Kanpur Nagar through its Vice Chancellor and respondent no. 3-Chandra Shekhar Azad Agricultural and Technological University, Kanpur Nagar through its Registrar, District Inspector of Schools, Mathura are directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Vibha Singh (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad