Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81475 (KAR)

PALLE LAKSHMI PRASANNA v. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

MFA/4873/2024 · 2025-07-12

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T M NADAF & MR. JAVEED S., MEMBER M.F.A.No.4873/2024 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.5460/2025) BETWEEN: 1. PALLE LAKSHMI PRASANNA W/O LATE PALLE NARAYANA, NOW AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 2. PALLE MEGHANA D/O LATE PALLE NARAYANA, NOW AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 3. PALLE GOUTHAM S/O LATE PALLE NARAYANA, NOW AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, 4. PALLE GPAL NAIDU S/O PALLE VENKATAIAH, NOW ABOUT 70 YEARS, 5. PALLE LAKSHMIDEVI W/O PALLE GOPAL NAIDU, NOW AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2 NOTE: THE APPELLANT NO.3 IS SINCE MINOR REP BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THE APPELLANT NO.1 ALL ARE R/AT NO.2-37, MADURA, MADUR, CUDDAPAH, ANDHARA PRADESH - 516 484 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RANGEGOWDA N R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.132, SRI. BALAJI SOVEREIGN, 2ND FLOOR, NEXT TO URBAN EDGE, BRIGADE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025. REP. BY ITS MANAGER 2. M/S KUSHAL ENTERPRISES TC HALL GATE, DOMMASANDRA, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS OWNER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVI S SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.06.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.1850/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU (SCCH- 06), BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant/s - Claimant/s is/are present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/s-claimant/s (being authorized by the appellant/s-claimant/s to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant/s-claimant/s has/have agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.8,60,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh Sixty Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The amount of Rs.8,60,000/- shall be released in favour of appellant No.3. 4 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TIN/-