M/S NATRAJ ORGANICS LTD AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/26227/2025 · 2025-09-11
Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 81473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 26227 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. The following prayers have been made in the writ petition:-
"(a) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the impugned order/award dated 29.08.2024 passed by respondent no. 2 (The Zonal Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Saharanpur) in Reference No.UP/44/M/SRE00149/2023 M/s. Manogya Industries Vs. M/s. Natraj Organics Ltd. (b) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to adopt any coercive measure against the petitioner pursuance of the impugned order and the respondents may further be directed to afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in Reference No.UP/44/M/SRE00149/2023 M/s. Manogya Industries Vs. M/s. Natraj Organics Ltd. by deciding representation dated 19.06.2025 filed by the petitioner, during the pendency of the present writ petition within certain stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court or in alternative the matter may be sent before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Hon'ble Court for settlement of dispute."
2. Sri A.C.Srivastava, Advocate appearing for the respondent no.4 has raised a preliminary objection that against the impugned award dated 29.8.2024 passed by Zonal Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Shankar Shukla, Prabhakar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.C.Srivastava, C.S.C. M/S Natraj Organics Ltd And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Saharanpur, the petitioners have remedy available under Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
3. On such objection being raised, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy provided under the Act, 2006.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy available under the Act, 2006. September 12, 2025 Anil WRIC No. 26227 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad