Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81456 (KAR)

H G DILIPKUMAR v. PRABHAKAR REDDY

WP/21456/2025 · 2025-07-30

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29261 WP No. 21456 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21456 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. H G DILIPKUMAR S/O.LATE H. GURUMURTHY RAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT: NO.35, KR ROAD BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE 560 004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY RAJ D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS S/O N.NAGARAJU REDDY R/AT- FARM HOUSE IN SY NO.98/1, KONASANDRA VILLAGE HAROHALLI, HOBLI KANAKAPURA 562112 2. SMT R. PADMAVATHI W/O. N. PRABAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT- FARM HOUSE IN SY NO.98/1, KONASANDRA VILLAGE HAROHALLI, HOBLI KANAKAPURA 562112 3. LATE SRI.G.K.JAGADISH S/O LATE KADE GOWDA Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29261 WP No. 21456 of 2025 REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS 4. SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O SRI.G.K.JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 5. SMT.HARSHITHA D/O SRI.G.K.JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 6. SMT.SUPRITHA D/O SRI.G.K.JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 7. SRI. SUMANTH S/O SRI.G.K.JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R3 - R7 AARE RESIDING AT HALE GABBADI VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK- 562 112. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIVEK SUBBA REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.N. SUBBA REDDY, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER ON IA NO. 5 DTD. 23.06.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA IN OS NO. 126/2019 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A OF THIS WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29261 WP No. 21456 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at length, would seek leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and urge all the contentions that are urged in the subject petition before the concerned Court at the appropriate stage. 2. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. 3. It is open to the plaintiffs to amend the cause title bringing in the petitioner as defendant No.6. 4. All other applications that are pending would be considered in accordance with law. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61