Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 81452 (KAR)

MR ABDUL RAHMAN BAIG v. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY

RP/262/2025 · 2025-07-31

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29722-DB RP No. 262 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REVIEW PETITION NO. 262 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MR ABDUL RAHMAN BAIG SON OF OBEDULLA BAIG AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 301, 3RD FLOOR, CRESCENT HEIGHTS, AMC LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHILASH RAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR M/S AMBIDANT MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED 3RD FLOOR, MINI V.V TOWER PODIUM BLOCK, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY DR. ASHOKA D.R, JOINT SECRETARY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2. M/S AMBIDANT MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED REGD OFFICE AT NO. 9A, K.H.B MAINROAD KANAKANAGARA, R.T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 032 Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29722-DB RP No. 262 of 2025 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SYED FAREED AHMED S/O D.S JALALUDDIN AGE:58 YEARS, R./A NO. 374, KUSHALNAGAR OPPOSITE HANIFIYA MASJID VENKATESHAPURAM, BANGALORE-560 045 3. SABIRA BEGUM W/O SYED FAREED AHMED AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS TRUSTEE OF M/S AMBIDANT TRUST MANAGEMENT R/A NO. 302, 3RD FLOOR, CRESCENT HEIGHT AMC LAYOUT, BENGLAURU-560 032 AND NO. 345, 2ND CROSS RAMA TENT ROAD, NEAR HANIFAMASZID KUSHAL NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 045 4. NABEELA BEGUM, W/O SYED AFAQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS TRUSTEE OF M/s AMBIDANT TRUST MANAGEMENT R/A NO. 345, 2ND CROSS, RAMA TENT ROAD NEAR HANIFA MASZID, KUSHAL NAGAR BANGALORE-560 045 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEERESH R BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE IS DIRECTED TO TAKE NOTICE FOR RESPONDENTS VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 31/07/2025) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2025 PASSED IN M.F.A NO.948 OF 2024 AND ALLOW THE PRESENT REVIEW PETITION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29722-DB RP No. 262 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel Sri Veeresh R.Budihal accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that the learned Single Judge in Annexure-B - judgment had left open the right of the review petitioner to approach the Special Court, so that he will have an opportunity to have his say before the Competent Court. It is therefore urged that the dismissal of MFA.No.948/2024 should not stand in the way of the appellant approaching the Special Court. 4. We have considered the contentions advanced. The appeal had been preferred against the order passed by the Special Court making provisional attachment absolute. We fail to see how the review petitioner can be permitted to go before the Special Court and put forth his contentions because there is - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29722-DB RP No. 262 of 2025 nothing pending before the Special Court for him to raise his objections. 5. In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the review petition does not merit our consideration. The review petition fails and the same is accordingly dismissed. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69