PREM PAL v. GM DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE UNA AND OTHERS
CMPMO/90/2025 · 2025-03-18
Satyen Vaidya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8145 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8145 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.90 of 2025 Decided on: 18.03.2025 Prem Pal ….Petitioner Versus General Manager & others ….Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate. For the respondents: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge
(Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to approach the Court of first instance with a similar prayer for appointment of Local Commissioner, if so required, at appropriate stage of the proceedings. Prayer allowed.
2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed along with pending application(s), if any. ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge March 18, 2025 (vt)