- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45998 WP No. 11357 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 11357 OF 2025 (T-CUS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R. INDRANI, W/O LATE V. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO. 398, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 12TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU – 560 086 2. SMT MAHESHWARI RAMALINGAM D/O LATE V. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO. 398, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 12TH CROSS, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU – 560 086. 3. SRI NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE V. RAMALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1279, 8TH MAIN ROAD, 11TH B CROSS, M L PURAM EXTENSION, BENGALURU – 560 086 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHINMAY J. MIRJI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS BENGALURU CUSTOMS ZONE, CENTRAL REVENUE (C.R) BUILDING, NO.1, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE NO. 8(P)2,1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, OPPOSITE TO BDA COMPLEX, HBR LAYOUT, Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45998 WP No. 11357 of 2025 KALYAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 043 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MADHU N. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO RELEASE THE GOLD AND CASH SEIZED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEARING NO. NO. GEN/INC/OTH/444/2024-HPU-O/O-COMMR-CUSCITYBENGALURU DATED 12.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-‘A’. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under: “The undersigned counsel for the petitioners is herewith seeking leave of this Hon’ble Court to permit the Petitioners to withdraw the instant petition as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Hon’ble Court. Hence, this Memo may kindly be taken on record, in the interest of justice.” The aforesaid memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 79